Tuleyome's Policy Corner - A Win for Conservation! The Bureau of Land Management's "Public Lands Rule"

Hekia Bodwitch • July 2, 2024

July 10, 2024 is the ninth anniversary of Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. To celebrate, we are sharing news about a recent win for conservation.

 

Last month, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)’s “Public Lands Rule” went into effect. BLM is the nation’s largest land manager, managing 10% of the nation’s total landmass, including part of Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. As directed by the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), BLM is required to manage land for “multiple use and sustained yield.” The Public Lands Rule directs BLM to consider “conservation” as a “use” to manage for.

 

The Rule defines conservation as protection and restoration, and identifies tools BLM can use to achieve conservation. These tools include Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) designation processes, which BLM managers can apply to important resources and unique scenic landscapes. When an area becomes an ACEC, BLM must manage to protect its significance. ACECs were previously authorized through FLPMA, and the Rule clarifies steps BLM can take to implement them. The Rule also defines new tools for BLM to use to promote conservation. These new tools include restoration and mitigation leases, which BLM can issue to outside entities, including non-profits, to restore public lands or offset the impacts of a particular action. For example, a group such as Tuleyome could apply for a restoration lease that would enable the group to restore land in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. When a restoration lease is in place, casual uses of the land for recreation, hunting and fishing, or research activities will generally be allowed. Restoration leases cannot be used to prohibit activities that are already allowed for in a region’s Resource Management Plan (RMP).

 

What’s next?

 

The Public Lands Rule holds implications for how BLM develops Resource Management Plans (RMPs), including the RMP for Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. For example, the Rule directs BLM to maintain an inventory of landscape intactness. When updating RMPs, BLM is to use a baseline condition of intactness as well as “available high quality information,” including Indigenous Knowledge, to: 1) identify intact landscapes; 2) evaluate alternatives to protect intact landscapes from degradation; and 3) determine which intact landscapes will be managed for protection. BLM intends to identify intactness through watershed condition assessments, an example of which can be found here.

 

The Rule represents an unprecedented mandate for BLM to advance conservation. However, BLM’s ability to implement the Rule, in management planning for Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and elsewhere, is contingent on adequate funding. In the coming weeks and months, Congress will determine BLM’s budget. As a result, the time is ripe to ask Congress to support BLM. **Click here** to send a letter to your representatives.


Not surprisingly, some are promoting legislation to challenge the Public Lands Rule. In April, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Western Economic Security Today (WEST) Act, which would withdraw the Rule and prohibit BLM from implementing similar rules in the future. It is unlikely that this stand-alone bill will pass the Senate, but it is possible that WEST Act supporters will push similar proposals into a large government funding package. If this scenario unfolds, we will be calling on you to urge your Congressional representatives to protect the Public Lands Rule.


In the meantime, we thank the Biden Administration for establishing this historic legislation, and we look forward to working with BLM to help implement it. 


-Hekia Bodwitch (hbodwitch@tuleyome.org)

Policy Director

RECENT ARTICLES

By Geoff Benn • October 7, 2026
Blue oaks on the Berryessa Peak Trail. Photo by Geoff Benn. Our September Nature and You speaker was Tuleyome Education Associate Geoff Benn, who gave a lecture on one of his favorite subjects, California’s amazing oaks. In the lecture, Geoff discussed how California’s oaks evolved and how they deal with a range of challenges, including drought, fire, and diseases. If you missed it, be sure to check out his talk here. 
By Geoff Benn • October 7, 2026
Interns Deana Martinez, Yaquelin Gonzalez, Gabriella Limon, Ben Hubbard, and Keira Lazaro at Woodland Regional Park Preserve. Tuleyome is excited to welcome our largest ever cohort of interns, including four Horticultural Interns and one Communications Intern! Our Horticultural Interns are paired with volunteer mentors at Woodland Regional Park Preserve where they learn about managing invasive plants and monitoring populations of rare native plants. This year’s mentors are Jennifer Hogan and Teri Barry, both longtime volunteers and leadership team members at the Preserve. Our Communications Intern works closely with Program Director Nate Lillge to shape and execute our communications, including social media, e-newsletters, and more. Keep reading to meet each of our interns: Horticultural Intern Yaquelin Gonzalez has lived within the bounds of Sacramento County her whole life, where her mother’s garden and love for rock collecting sparked her appreciation for nature. Her desire to enter the environmental field was further fueled via nature-based field trips during elementary school. After high school, she began studying at American River College and eventually transferred to the University of California, Davis in 2025 to study Environmental Science and Management, focusing on Ecology, Biodiversity, and Conservation. Here, she has gained an interest in soil science as well as plant ecology and hopes to pursue a research career in restoration ecology. In her spare time, she likes to go on nature walks, play the guitar, read, bake, and listen to podcasts. Horticultural Intern Ben Hubbard grew up in Roseville, California where he spent a lot of time outdoors with friends, competing in sports, hiking, as well as instructing elementary school field trips about the environment, specifically wetlands. He just recently transferred from Sierra College to the University of California, Davis and is working towards completing his Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science and Management with a specialization in Ecology. When he completes his education, he hopes he can make a difference in the world and help to preserve wildlife and natural land for the next generation to enjoy as much as he has. When he’s taking a break from studying you can find him practicing with his recreational sports team, grabbing a coffee, hiking, enjoying a good story, or just hanging out with friends. Horticultural Intern Keira Lazaro is a third year undergraduate at University of California, Davis where she majors in Environmental Toxicology. She’s specializing in pharmacology and biotechnology with hopes to work in a research lab on specific pathogens that attack native California crops. She is also a part of the University Honors Program in Davis and is taking the first couple of steps towards her fourth year signature work on the oxidation chemistry behind electronic cigarette devices, specifically with exposure in indoor environments. Keira grew up in Los Angeles County and hopes to find a career in Southern California once she graduates. When she is able to go back home she spends most of her free time at the beach or hiking. Communications Intern Gabriella Limon grew up in Bishop, California, within the Sierra Nevada and Owens Valley where she became connected with wildlife and stewardship. She spent her later teenage years in Southern California and committed to the University of California, Davis, where she is currently pursuing a Bachelor's Degree in Environmental Policy Analysis and Planning with a focus on conservation management. In addition, she is also a scholar staff member of the UC Davis Women’s Resources and Research Center where she provides STEM-based programming and academic support to students of marginalized identities. Gabby is especially passionate about wildlife justice, land protection, and environmental education. She spends her free time writing, playing video games, tide pooling, hiking, and logging critters. Horticultural Intern Deana Martinez grew up in Arbuckle, California, surrounded by rice fields and almond orchards, which grew her interests in agriculture. She is currently in her 4th year at the University of California, Davis, where she is pursuing a Bachelor’s Degree in Entomology with a Soil Science minor. Along with classes, she is involved in a Nematology research lab, working with plant parasitic nematodes and their interactions with common crop systems in California. She has also held a student position with the Plant Biology research greenhouses as a technician for the past 3 years. Outside of school and work, Deana enjoys hiking, reading, and spending time with her family.
By Shai Demus • October 7, 2026
California’s condors and sea otters are two of conservation’s great comeback stories – species that were once on the brink of extinction and have rebounded thanks in large part to the Endangered Species Act (ESA). That 50-year-old law is now facing one of the most significant rollbacks in its history, and California is fighting back in court. Last week, Attorney General Rob Bonta, joined by a coalition of 21 state attorneys general, filed two lawsuits challenging the Trump administration’s recent changes to the ESA. At the center of the fight is a single but enormously consequential change: the administration rescinded the longstanding definition of “harm” under the Act – a definition that, since the early 1980s, has made it illegal to destroy or damage the places endangered species live, breed, and feed. Without it, habitat destruction itself may no longer count as illegal “harm” to a species, even though most biologists agree habitat loss is the single biggest threat facing endangered species today. The changes don’t stop there. The administration is also making it easier for federal agencies to avoid designating “critical habitat” for at-risk species, and it has eliminated automatic protections for newly-listed threatened species – meaning wildlife officials must now write custom protection rules for each species one at a time. That’s a heavy lift for an agency that has reportedly lost more than a third of its staff, and which currently has 400 species waiting for a protection decision. Why this matters here at home California is home to more threatened and endangered species than any other state. It’s natural to assume the state’s own Endangered Species Act would fill any gap left by federal rollbacks – but legal experts point out that California’s law, as written, doesn’t clearly protect habitat at all. It primarily prohibits killing or injuring individual members of a listed species, not damaging the places they live. That means the very thing under threat federally – habitat protection – may not have a reliable backstop at the state level either. What this means for our work At Tuleyome, so much of what we do, protecting oak woodlands, wildlife corridors, and watershed habitat across our region – depends on the basic principle that a species' home matters as much as the species itself. A condor or a Clear Lake hitch can’t survive court-ordered protection from hunting alone if the habitat it depends on is quietly bulldozed, drilled, or logged out from under it. This lawsuit is about defending that basic principle at the federal level, and it’s a reminder of why local land protection and legislative advocacy matters now more than ever – because the safety net above us may have real holes in it.